Skip to main content
Radar

Keep up with the models you depend on. Follow price changes, retirements, and API updates.Follow the models you depend on.

Follow model changes
Tencent logo
Model A
Hy3

Tencent

60.93/100

Supported · Public rank #63

90% interval 46.775.1

Hy3 vs Inkling

Updated September 10, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

Thinking Machines Lab logo
Model B
Inkling

Thinking Machines Lab

60.29/100

Supported · Public rank #66

90% interval 50.470.2

Decision reading

The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead.

0 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Share or export

Share on XLinkedInSocial cardCSVJSON

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Hy3

    Hy3 leads on the public coding lane, 58.2 to 41.2, with Supported evidence for both models and non-overlapping 90% intervals.

    Confidence: stronger

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    Inkling

    Inkling has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented

Show secondary and unsupported calls
  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    Hy3 is scored on Estimated evidence for agentic, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.

    Confidence: limited

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shared results
0
Hy3 only
0
Inkling only
21
Like-for-like categories
1 / 8

2 categories rest on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Coding

Like-for-like
Hy3
58.2
Supported · #28/151
Inkling
41.2
Supported · #111/151
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 6 public rows
Reading
Hy3 leads

Agentic

Directional only
Hy3
48.4
Estimated · #67/152
Inkling
38.3
Supported · #122/152
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 4 public rows
Reading
Directional only

Knowledge

Directional only
Hy3
56.4
Estimated · #48/182
Inkling
57.5
Supported · #43/182
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 6 public rows
Reading
Directional only

Reasoning

Not comparable
Hy3
75.3
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Inkling
74.1
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Hy3
Not ranked
Inkling
78.9
Unranked · 1 rankable row
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Hy3
Not ranked
Inkling
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Hy3
Not ranked
Inkling
49.2
#38/48
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
Hy3
Not ranked
Inkling
85.2
#43/121
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

A shared-evidence shape is not available.

BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Hy3
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Inkling
$0.00421
Fits in one request

Hy3 has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Hy3
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Inkling
$0.10754
Fits in one request

Hy3 has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Hy3
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Inkling
$0.159
Fits in one request

Hy3 has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Context window

Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.

Hy3

256K

Inkling

1M

API model ID

Hy3

Not sourced

Inkling

Not sourced

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Hy3

No comparable hosted API rate

Inkling

$0.374 per 1M cached input tokens

Documented inputs

Hy3

Not sourced

Inkling

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Hy3

Not sourced

Inkling

Not sourced

Provider availability

Hy3

Not sourced

Inkling

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Hy3

Reasoning

Inkling

Hybrid

Weight access

Hy3

Open Weight

Inkling

Open Weight

License

Hy3

Open Weight

Inkling

Open Weight

Release date

Hy3

2026-07-06

Inkling

2026-07-15

If you already use one of these models
Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Inkling has the larger documented window (1M).

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence21 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Hy3
    Inkling63.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    Hy3
    Inkling77.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP Atlas

    Hy3
    Inkling74.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)

    Hy3
    Inkling47.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Hy3
    Inkling77.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Pro

    Hy3
    Inkling54.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Hy3
    Inkling63.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierSWE v2

    Hy3
    Inkling4.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • LiveCodeBench (Vals)

    Hy3
    Inkling85.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench (Vals)

    Hy3
    Inkling77.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • GPQA

    Hy3
    Inkling87.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA-D

    Hy3
    Inkling87.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE

    Hy3
    Inkling46%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE w/o tools

    Hy3
    Inkling30%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA Diamond (Vals)

    Hy3
    Inkling87.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro (Vals)

    Hy3
    Inkling86.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • AIME26

    Hy3
    Inkling97.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • MMMU-Pro

    Hy3
    Inkling73.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CharXiv

    Hy3
    Inkling82%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CharXiv w/o tools

    Hy3
    Inkling78.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFBench

    Hy3
    Inkling79.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Hy3 or Inkling?

The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Hy3 or Inkling?

Hy3 leads the public coding lane, 58.2 to 41.2, with Supported evidence for both models and non-overlapping 90% intervals.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 or Inkling?

Hy3 scores higher for agentic tasks on the public lane, 48.4 to 38.3. Hy3 is scored on Estimated evidence for agentic tasks, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for agentic tasks from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.

Which costs less, Hy3 or Inkling?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Hy3 or Inkling?

Inkling has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 256K.

Related comparisons

Last updated September 10, 2026

Watch Hy3 vs Inkling

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.