Coding
Like-for-like- Hy4 preview
- 65.7
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 62.5
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Hy4 preview leads
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
Start the free Radar BriefUpdated August 28, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
Hy4 preview has the higher public score estimate, 79.16 versus 61.32, but the 90% score intervals overlap. Treat that as a lead, not a settled winner.
11 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Hy4 preview
Hy4 preview leads on the same 1 weighted benchmark row.
Confidence: limited
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Hy4 preview
Hy4 preview has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
| Category | Hy4 preview | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 65.7 | 62.5 | Like-for-like1 vs 1 rows | Hy4 preview leads |
| Knowledge | 60.4 | 43.4 | Like-for-like2 vs 2 rows | Hy4 preview leads |
| Agentic | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 66.2 | 90.6 | Not comparable1 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | 81.3 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
HLE
Knowledge
SWE-bench Pro
Coding
GPQA
Knowledge
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has no comparable published API token rate.
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has no comparable published API token rate.
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has no comparable published API token rate.
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Hy4 preview
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Hy4 preview
tencent/Hy4-preview
Tencent Hy4 preview model cardQwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model cardA missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Hy4 preview
No comparable hosted API rate
Tencent Hy4 preview model cardQwen3.8-Flash-Next
No comparable hosted API rate
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model cardHy4 preview
Not sourced
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Not sourced
Hy4 preview
Not sourced
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Not sourced
Hy4 preview
Not sourced
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Not sourced
Hy4 preview
Reasoning
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Reasoning
Hy4 preview
Open Weight
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open Weight
Hy4 preview
Open Weight
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open Weight
Hy4 preview
2026-08-28
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
2026-08-26
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Not directly comparable
CyberGym
Not directly comparable
WideResearch
Not directly comparable
DRACO
Not directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Not directly comparable
Toolathlon-Verified
Hy4 preview leads this result
APEX-Agents
Not directly comparable
skillsBench
Not directly comparable
JobBench
Hy4 preview leads this result
Agents' Last Exam
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads this result
AutomationBench
Not directly comparable
BankerToolBench
Not directly comparable
HLE w/ tools
Not directly comparable
CoWorkBench
Not directly comparable
AndroidWorld
Not directly comparable
OSWorld 2.0
Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Hy4 preview leads this result
SWE Multilingual
Hy4 preview leads this result
deepSwe
Hy4 preview leads this result
NL2Repo
Hy4 preview leads this result
ProgramBench
Not directly comparable
PostTrain Bench
Not directly comparable
sweMarathon
Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench v6
Not directly comparable
CritPt
Not directly comparable
GPQA
Hy4 preview leads this result
GPQA-D
Hy4 preview leads this result
HLE
Hy4 preview leads this result
HLE w/o tools
Hy4 preview leads this result
Apex
Not directly comparable
OfficeQA Pro
Not directly comparable
Vision2Web
Not directly comparable
ERQA
Not directly comparable
LVBench
Not directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Not directly comparable
MathVision
Not directly comparable
MathVision w/ Python
Not directly comparable
CharXiv w/o tools
Not directly comparable
CharXiv
Not directly comparable
IFBench
Not directly comparable
Hy4 preview has the higher public score estimate, 79.16 versus 61.32, but the 90% score intervals overlap. The higher estimate is not a decisive winner because the uncertainty ranges overlap.
Hy4 preview leads the like-for-like coding comparison across 1 shared weighted benchmark row.
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Hy4 preview has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 262K.
Last updated August 28, 2026
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.