Capability
67.5/100
field median 58.3
#25 of 226 ranked models
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
Start free briefReleased Aug 26, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of August 26, 2026 · How the score is built
Instruction Following ranks #5. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
24 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
67.5/100
field median 58.3
#25 of 226 ranked models
Price
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 97 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
262Ktokens
field median 203,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next category percentile values
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.
Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.
Estimate VRAM from known parametersScores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #13 of 138Percentile 91stWeight 22%6 benchmarksVerified | 62.7 | #13 of 138 | 91st | 22% | 6 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #32 of 144Percentile 78thWeight 20%5 benchmarksVerified | 61.2 | #32 of 144 | 78th | 20% | 5 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%4 benchmarksVerified | 55.0 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%8 benchmarksVerified | 81.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 8 benchmarks | Verified |
| Inst. FollowingRank #5 of 42Percentile 90thWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | 94.4 | #5 of 42 | 90th | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Pro | Score62.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 80.3% | Gap17.8 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Provider exact |
| SWE Multilingual | Score81% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 89.5% | Gap8.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| NL2Repo | Score48.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · 61.5% | Gap13.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| deepSwe | Score58.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 72.7% | Gap14 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Score91.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 93.2% | Gap1.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoWorkBench | Score73.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 74.8% | Gap0.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| JobBench | Score55.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 55.7% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Agents' Last Exam | Score51.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 52.4% | Gap1.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Score73.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 80.6% | Gap7.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| AndroidWorld | Score84.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 85.3% | Gap0.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Score19.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 70.6% | Gap51.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLEHumanity's Last Exam | Score35.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 64.7% | Gap28.8 behind | WeightWeighted 45% | Provider exact |
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score91.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap3.8 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Provider exact |
| GPQA-DGPQA Diamond | Score91.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap3.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| HLE w/o toolsHumanity's Last Exam without tools | Score35.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 59% | Gap23.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CharXivCharXiv Reasoning | Score90.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 93.5% | Gap2.9 behind | WeightWeighted 25% | Provider exact |
| Vision2Web | Score64.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 69.0% | Gap5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| ERQA | Score72.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 77.8% | Gap5.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| LVBench | Score76.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 81.8% | Gap5.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| RealWorldQA | Score88.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 88.5% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MathVision | Score90.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2% | Gap4.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MathVision w/ PythonMathVision with Python | Score95.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Kimi K3 · 97.8% | Gap2.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| CharXiv w/o toolsCharXiv Reasoning without tools | Score84.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 88.9% | Gap4.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchInstruction Following Benchmark | Score81.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85% | Gap3.7 behind | WeightWeighted 65% | Provider exact |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Aug 26, 2026 · you are here
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextScore 67.5 · Price not listed
experimental-preview · Next
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ranks #25 of 226 on the public leaderboard with a score of 67.54/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is a open weight model with a 262K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Qwen publishes the BF16 post-trained checkpoint on Hugging Face under the Qwen Community 1.0 license. The model card documents native text, image, and video input, reasoning-effort controls, and a 262,144-token native context window that can be extended to 1,000,000 tokens with YaRN. Qwen Cloud offers a separate production Qwen3.8-Flash model based on this architecture; this row does not inherit that sibling's features or pricing.
Official exact-value snapshot from Qwen's August 26, 2026 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model card and technical report. We map only the post-trained model-card rows that match existing protocols, keep the 262,144-token native context instead of the optional 1M YaRN extension, and preserve paired no-Code-Interpreter and Code-Interpreter visual scores separately. DeepSWE 1.1 uses the best result across Claude Code and mini-SWE-agent, SWE-bench Pro uses Qwen's corrected-task Claude Code run, and the remaining harness-specific agent results stay display-only. ClawEval-MM, RecreationBench, and the technical report's 14 base-model benchmarks remain outside this post-trained row rather than being collapsed into non-equivalent or cross-stage fields.
24 of 406 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #5, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #32. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
Alibaba · Model release
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ranks #25 out of 226 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 67.54/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 24 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ranks #32 out of 144 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 61.2/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ranks #13 out of 138 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 62.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ranks #5 out of 42 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 94.4/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is an open-weight model from Alibaba. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.
No. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next currently has 24 source-displayable rows across 406 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has a documented context window of 262K. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Related resources
Last updated August 26, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.