Model comparison
Inkling vs Laguna XS.2
Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Inkling #17; Laguna XS.2 unranked
Evidence parity. Inkling and Laguna XS.2 share 4 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Inkling; 1 to Laguna XS.2.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 4
- Inkling only
- 12
- Laguna XS.2 only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick Inkling if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna XS.2 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Inkling is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 46. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Inkling's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 69.4 against 35.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.8% to 35.7%.
Inkling is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Laguna XS.2. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Laguna XS.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Inkling gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Laguna XS.2.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Inkling | Δ | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Inkling69.4 | Margin← 33.7 | Laguna XS.235.7 |
| Coding | Inkling68.6 | Margin← 7.8 | Laguna XS.260.8 |
| Knowledge | Inkling51.7 | MarginNo overlap | Laguna XS.2Not measured |
| Math | Inkling97.1 | MarginNo overlap | Laguna XS.2Not measured |
| Multimodal | Inkling76.5 | MarginNo overlap | Laguna XS.2Not measured |
| Inst. Following | Inkling79.8 | MarginNo overlap | Laguna XS.2Not measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 63.8%B 35.7%Winner: InklingΔ 28.1Terminal-Bench 2.0: Inkling scored 63.8%; Laguna XS.2 scored 35.7%. Inkling wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 54.3%B 46.3%Winner: InklingΔ 8SWE-bench Pro: Inkling scored 54.3%; Laguna XS.2 scored 46.3%. Inkling wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 77.6%B 69.9%Winner: InklingΔ 7.7SWE-bench Verified: Inkling scored 77.6%; Laguna XS.2 scored 69.9%. Inkling wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Inkling | Laguna XS.2 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | Laguna XS.2$0 input / $0 output | Laguna XS.2 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | InklingNot available | Laguna XS.2Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | InklingNot available | Laguna XS.2Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Inkling1M | Laguna XS.2256K | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Inkling or Laguna XS.2?
Inkling is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 46. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 63.8% and 35.7%.
Which is better for coding, Inkling or Laguna XS.2?
Inkling has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 68.6 versus 60.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Inkling or Laguna XS.2?
Inkling has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.4 versus 35.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.