Model comparison
Inkling vs Sarvam 105B
Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Inkling #17; Sarvam 105B unranked
BenchAlign evidence: Inkling not scored; Sarvam 105B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Inkling and Sarvam 105B share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to Inkling; 3 to Sarvam 105B.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 9
- Inkling only
- 23
- Sarvam 105B only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Inkling and Sarvam 105B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Inkling is priced at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Sarvam 105B. Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Sarvam 105B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Inkling | Δ | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Inkling69.4 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 105BNot measured |
| Coding | Inkling68.6 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 105BNot measured |
| Knowledge | Inkling51.7 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 105BNot measured |
| Math | Inkling97.1 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 105BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Inkling76.5 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 105BNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Inkling79.8 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 105BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Inkling | Sarvam 105B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | Sarvam 105B$0 input / $0 output | Sarvam 105B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | InklingNot available | Sarvam 105BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | InklingNot available | Sarvam 105BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Inkling1M | Sarvam 105B128K | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Sarvam 105B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 77.1% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 74.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | 1258 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 32.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 36.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1239 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 836 | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 23.7% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 46.8% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Sarvam 105B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 46% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 30% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 40.7% | 11.9% | Inkling leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.2% | 73.8% | Inkling leads |
| AA-HLESource | 29.7% | 10.1% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 2.1% | -59.5% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 40.0% | 17.6% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 63.1% | 93.5% | Inkling leads |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Sarvam 105B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | 97.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Inkling and Sarvam 105B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Inkling and Sarvam 105B today?
Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Sarvam 105B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.