Skip to main content

Model comparison

Inkling vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Thinking Machines Lab
69/100
Margin
24.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Inkling #17; Soofi S 30B-A3B unranked

Evidence parity. Inkling and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to Inkling; 6 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
2
Inkling only
14
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
6
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Inkling if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Inkling is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Inkling's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 51.7 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 87.9% to 43.4%.

Inkling is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Soofi S 30B-A3B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Inkling and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryInklingΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeInkling51.7Margin 1.8Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
AgenticInkling69.4MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
CodingInkling68.6MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MathInkling97.1MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MultimodalInkling76.5MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
Inst. FollowingInkling79.8MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · InklingB · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87.9%B 43.4%
    Winner: InklingΔ 44.5
    GPQA: Inkling scored 87.9%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. Inkling wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondInklingNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenInklingNot availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensInkling1MSoofi S 30B-A3B1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 77.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeInkling wins
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
GPQASource 87.9%43.4%Inkling leads
GPQA-DSource 87.9%43.4%Inkling leads
HLESource 46%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 30%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkInklingSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Inkling or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Inkling is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87.9% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Inkling or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Inkling has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.7 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.