Model comparison
Inkling vs ZAYA1-74B-Preview
Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Inkling #17; ZAYA1-74B-Preview unranked
Evidence parity. Inkling and ZAYA1-74B-Preview share 4 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Inkling; 3 to ZAYA1-74B-Preview.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 4
- Inkling only
- 12
- ZAYA1-74B-Preview only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 3 / 8
Pick Inkling if you want the stronger benchmark profile. ZAYA1-74B-Preview only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Inkling is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Inkling's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 97.1 against 76.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 87.9% to 57.3%. ZAYA1-74B-Preview does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Inkling is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for ZAYA1-74B-Preview. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. ZAYA1-74B-Preview is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Inkling gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for ZAYA1-74B-Preview.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Inkling | Δ | ZAYA1-74B-Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | Inkling97.1 | Margin← 20.7 | ZAYA1-74B-Preview76.4 |
| Coding | Inkling68.6 | Margin← 15.4 | ZAYA1-74B-Preview53.2 |
| Knowledge | Inkling51.7 | Margin→ 14.4 | ZAYA1-74B-Preview66.1 |
| Agentic | Inkling69.4 | MarginNo overlap | ZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot measured |
| Multimodal | Inkling76.5 | MarginNo overlap | ZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Inkling79.8 | MarginNo overlap | ZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 87.9%B 57.3%Winner: InklingΔ 30.6GPQA: Inkling scored 87.9%; ZAYA1-74B-Preview scored 57.3%. Inkling wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 77.6%B 53.2%Winner: InklingΔ 24.4SWE-bench Verified: Inkling scored 77.6%; ZAYA1-74B-Preview scored 53.2%. Inkling wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
AIME26
MathA 97.1%B 76.4%Winner: InklingΔ 20.7AIME26: Inkling scored 97.1%; ZAYA1-74B-Preview scored 76.4%. Inkling wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Inkling | ZAYA1-74B-Preview | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | ZAYA1-74B-Preview$0 input / $0 output | ZAYA1-74B-Preview has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | InklingNot available | ZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | InklingNot available | ZAYA1-74B-PreviewNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Inkling1M | ZAYA1-74B-Preview256K | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic5 benchmarks
CodingInkling wins4 benchmarks
KnowledgeZAYA1-74B-Preview wins5 benchmarks
MathInkling wins1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | ZAYA1-74B-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | 97.1% | 76.4% | Inkling leads |
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | ZAYA1-74B-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchSource | 79.8% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Which is better, Inkling or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?
Inkling is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87.9% and 57.3%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Inkling or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?
ZAYA1-74B-Preview has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.1 versus 51.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, Inkling or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?
Inkling has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 68.6 versus 53.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for math, Inkling or ZAYA1-74B-Preview?
Inkling has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.1 versus 76.4. Inside this category, AIME26 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.