Model comparison
Interfaze Beta vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Interfaze Beta and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Interfaze Beta; 37 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 17, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Interfaze Beta only
- 8
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 37
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Interfaze Beta if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Interfaze Beta has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 63 versus 60. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Interfaze Beta's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 89.9 against 54.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 89.9% to 87%.
Interfaze Beta is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $3.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Interfaze Beta | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Interfaze Beta89.9 | Margin← 35.7 | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Agentic | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Reasoning | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Multilingual | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Multimodal | Interfaze Beta71.1 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 89.9%B 87%Winner: Interfaze BetaΔ 2.9GPQA: Interfaze Beta scored 89.9%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%. Interfaze Beta wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Interfaze Beta$1.5 input / $3.5 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Interfaze BetaNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Interfaze BetaNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Interfaze Beta1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spider 2.0-LiteSource | 52.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 36.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 39.9% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
KnowledgeInterfaze Beta wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 89.9% | 87% | Interfaze Beta leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 89.9% | 87.0% | Interfaze Beta leads |
| MMMLUSource | 90.9% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 21.6% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 37.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 86.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 26.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -0.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 28.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal6 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Interfaze Beta or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Interfaze Beta is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 63 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 89.9% and 87%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Interfaze Beta or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Interfaze Beta has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.9 versus 54.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.