Model comparison
Interfaze Beta vs Step 3.7 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Interfaze Beta unranked (Not scored); Step 3.7 Flash #110 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Interfaze Beta and Step 3.7 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Interfaze Beta; 29 to Step 3.7 Flash.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Interfaze Beta only
- 10
- Step 3.7 Flash only
- 29
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Interfaze Beta and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Interfaze Beta is priced at $1.50 input / $3.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens for Step 3.7 Flash. Interfaze Beta has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Step 3.7 Flash.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Interfaze Beta | Step 3.7 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Interfaze Beta$1.5 input / $3.5 output | Step 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 output | Step 3.7 Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Interfaze BetaNot available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Interfaze BetaNot available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Interfaze Beta1M | Step 3.7 Flash256K | Interfaze Beta lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 59.5% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 92.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 25.9% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 49.5% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 67.1% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 51.57% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 21.5% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 98.5% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1017 | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 14.8% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 89.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 89.9% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | 90.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 30.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 80.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 19.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -37.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 25.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 84.4% | Not comparable |
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCRBench V2Source | 70.7% | — | Not comparable |
| olmOCRSource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | 82.1% | — | Not comparable |
| VoxPopuli WERSource | 2.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | 71.1% | — | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 79.2% | Not comparable |
| V*Source | — | 95.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 75.3% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1211 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Interfaze Beta and Step 3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Interfaze Beta and Step 3.7 Flash today?
Interfaze Beta: $1.50 input / $3.50 output per 1M tokens Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.