Model comparison
Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.6 #13; MiMo-V2-Omni unranked
Evidence parity. Kimi K2.6 and MiMo-V2-Omni share 15 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 45 results are unique to Kimi K2.6; 0 to MiMo-V2-Omni.
Updated July 13, 2026- Shared results
- 15
- Kimi K2.6 only
- 45
- MiMo-V2-Omni only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Omni only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Kimi K2.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 74 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Omni gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.6.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Kimi K2.6 | Δ | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Kimi K2.672.6 | Margin→ 2.2 | MiMo-V2-Omni74.8 |
| Agentic | Kimi K2.673.5 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Knowledge | Kimi K2.642.2 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Math | Kimi K2.667.1 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Multimodal | Kimi K2.679.8 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 80.2%B 74.8%Winner: Kimi K2.6Δ 5.4SWE-bench Verified: Kimi K2.6 scored 80.2%; MiMo-V2-Omni scored 74.8%. Kimi K2.6 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Kimi K2.6$0.95 input / $4 output | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Kimi K2.6Not available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Kimi K2.6Not available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Kimi K2.6256K | MiMo-V2-Omni262K | MiMo-V2-Omni lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic22 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 66.7% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 83.2% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 73.1% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 50% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 55.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | 62.3% | 45.2% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| DeepSearchQASource | 92.5% | — | Not comparable |
| WideResearchSource | 80.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 30.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | 95.9% | 91.2% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 34.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1190 | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 28.5% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 56.82% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 18.0% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 4.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 809 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 19.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 38.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 0.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 31.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 20.6% | — | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Omni wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 80.2% | 74.8% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | 89.6% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | 89.6% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 58.6% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 76.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | 52.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 66.7% | — | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 37.89% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench31Source | 47.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 61.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 43.9% | 34.8% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 53.5% | 36.7% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | 65.9% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 34.7% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 44.2% | 35.0% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 91.1% | 82.8% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 35.9% | 19.9% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 6.4% | -17.4% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 32.8% | 18.7% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 39.3% | 44.4% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
Math5 benchmarks
Multimodal7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | 79.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource | 80.1% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 80.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | 87.4% | — | Not comparable |
| V*Source | 96.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 79.4% | 69.9% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1318 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 76.0% | 53.5% | Kimi K2.6 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or MiMo-V2-Omni?
Kimi K2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 74 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 80.2% and 74.8%.
Which is better for coding, Kimi K2.6 or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 72.6. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.