Model comparison
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and SWE-1.7 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract; 4 to SWE-1.7.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
- 15
- SWE-1.7 only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and SWE-1.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
SWE-1.7 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | SWE-1.7 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128K | SWE-1.7256K | SWE-1.7 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 1.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 28.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 5.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -83.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 5.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 94.0% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 33.1% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Can I compare LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and SWE-1.7 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.