Capability
Unranked
field median 58
Not eligible for a public rank
SWE-1.7
Released Jul 8, 2026 — see all recent releases
Decision reading
SWE-1.7 is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 4 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Data as of August 22, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Agentic ranks #38. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Validate before choosing
4 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
Not listed
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 91.5 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
256Ktokens
field median 200,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic1/1 verified
- Coding3/3 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MathNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 256K
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Current
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #38 of 137Percentile 73rdWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 55.2 | #38 of 137 | 73rd | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingWeight 20%3 benchmarksVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | Score42.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Fable 5 · 53.5% | Gap11.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score81.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap10.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| SWE Multilingual | Score77.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 89.5% | Gap11.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Agentic1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score81.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap10.4 behind | WeightWeighted 38% | Provider exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Jul 8, 2026 · you are here
SWE-1.7Not publicly ranked · Price not listed
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track SWE-1.7, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
SWE-1.7 is a proprietary model with a 256K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Official exact-value snapshot from Cognition's July 8, 2026 SWE-1.7 launch post. BenchLM maps only directly comparable public rows from Cognition's benchmark table: FrontierCode 1.1 Main, Terminal-Bench 2.1, and SWE-bench Multilingual. The context window is inherited from the Kimi K2.7 base model because Cognition does not publish a separate raw context-window figure in the announcement; Cognition also reports self-compaction training for longer-horizon Devin rollouts.
4 of 402 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #38. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Radar
Full release historySWE-1.7 release history
SWE-1.7 released
Cognition · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does SWE-1.7 perform overall in AI benchmarks?
SWE-1.7 has 4 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is SWE-1.7 good for coding and programming?
SWE-1.7 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is SWE-1.7 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
SWE-1.7 ranks #38 out of 137 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 55.2/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Does SWE-1.7 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. SWE-1.7 currently has 4 source-displayable rows across 402 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 has a reported context window of 256K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Last updated August 22, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch SWE-1.7 in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.