Skip to main content

Model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

23.49/100
Margin
35.1pts
winning →
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Llama 4 Maverick #191 (Supported); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.5 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 17 results are unique to Llama 4 Maverick; 10 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
1
Llama 4 Maverick only
17
MiMo-V2.5 only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.5
CategoryLlama 4 MaverickΔMiMo-V2.5
AgenticLlama 4 MaverickNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.565.8
CodingLlama 4 MaverickNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.556.1
MathLlama 4 Maverick0.7MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5Not measured
MultimodalLlama 4 MaverickNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.579.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLlama 4 Maverick$0 input / $0 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLlama 4 Maverick121 tok/sMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLlama 4 Maverick0.95 sMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLlama 4 Maverick1MMiMo-V2.51MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.3%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource -16Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
AA Coding IndexSource 16.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 33.1%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
AA-LCRSource 46.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 67.1%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.690%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 9011291MiMo-V2.5 leads
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.5Result
AA-IFBenchSource 43.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.5 today?

Llama 4 Maverick: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Llama 4 Maverick
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,610
Break-even
MiMo-V2.5
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.