Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

MAI-Thinking-1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
54.06/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2-Flash #91 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MAI-Thinking-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash share 4 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to MAI-Thinking-1; 15 to MiMo-V2-Flash.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
4
MAI-Thinking-1 only
9
MiMo-V2-Flash only
15
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. MAI-Thinking-1 makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; MiMo-V2-Flash is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

MAI-Thinking-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for MAI-Thinking-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash
CategoryMAI-Thinking-1ΔMiMo-V2-Flash
KnowledgeMAI-Thinking-172.5Margin→ 12.2MiMo-V2-Flash84.7
CodingMAI-Thinking-165.5Margin→ 7.9MiMo-V2-Flash73.4
AgenticMAI-Thinking-146.0MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2-FlashNot measured
MathMAI-Thinking-189.7MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2-FlashNot measured
Inst. FollowingMAI-Thinking-185.0MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2-FlashNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · MAI-Thinking-1B · MiMo-V2-Flash

  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 84.2%B 83.7%
    Winner: MAI-Thinking-1Δ 0.5
    GPQA: MAI-Thinking-1 scored 84.2%; MiMo-V2-Flash scored 83.7%. MAI-Thinking-1 wins this benchmark.

  2. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 73.5%B 73.4%
    Winner: MAI-Thinking-1Δ 0.1
    SWE-bench Verified: MAI-Thinking-1 scored 73.5%; MiMo-V2-Flash scored 73.4%. MAI-Thinking-1 wins this benchmark.

  3. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 85%B 84.9%
    Winner: MAI-Thinking-1Δ 0.1
    MMLU-Pro: MAI-Thinking-1 scored 85%; MiMo-V2-Flash scored 84.9%. MAI-Thinking-1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMAI-Thinking-1Not availableMiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMAI-Thinking-1Not availableMiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMAI-Thinking-1Not availableMiMo-V2-Flash2.14 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMAI-Thinking-1256KMiMo-V2-Flash256KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —12.0%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —83.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —16.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —833Not comparable
CodingMiMo-V2-Flash wins
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%73.4%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —49.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —25.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashResult
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —31.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource —0.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeMiMo-V2-Flash wins
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashResult
GPQASource 84.2%83.7%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
GPQA-DSource 84.2%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%84.9%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
SimpleQASource 31%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —24.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —65.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —8.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —-48.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —15.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —75.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashResult
AIME 2025Source 97%94.1%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
AIME26Source 94.5%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1MiMo-V2-FlashResult
IFBenchSource 85%—Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —39.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MAI-Thinking-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.7 versus 72.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, MAI-Thinking-1 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 65.5. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Microsoft Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.