Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MAI-Thinking-1
65
MiMo-V2-Flash
59
Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #23 · MiMo-V2-Flash unranked
Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Coding
+2.4 difference
Knowledge
+14.6 difference
Math
+2.9 difference
MAI-Thinking-1
MiMo-V2-Flash
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
129 t/s
N/A
2.14s
256K
256K
Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
MAI-Thinking-1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 65 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MAI-Thinking-1's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 97 against 94.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 97% to 94.1%. MiMo-V2-Flash does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
MAI-Thinking-1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 97% and 94.1%.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 69.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 71. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97 versus 94.1. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.