Skip to main content

MAI-Thinking-1 vs MiniMax M3

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MAI-Thinking-1

65

VS

MiniMax M3

76

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #23 · MiniMax M3 #13

Pick MiniMax M3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiniMax M3
46vs71.9

+25.9 difference

Coding

MAI-Thinking-1
71vs67

+4.0 difference

Operational Comparison

MAI-Thinking-1

MiniMax M3

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0.3 / $1.2

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiniMax M3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

MiniMax M3 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 76 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiniMax M3's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 71.9 against 46. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 46% to 66%. MAI-Thinking-1 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MAI-Thinking-1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiniMax M3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 76 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 46% and 66%.

Which is better for coding, MAI-Thinking-1 or MiniMax M3?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71 versus 67. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.9 versus 46. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.