Model comparison
MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 unranked (Not scored); Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) #66 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to MAI-Thinking-1; 2 to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- MAI-Thinking-1 only
- 13
- Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. MAI-Thinking-1 makes more sense if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window; Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
MAI-Thinking-1 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MAI-Thinking-1 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MAI-Thinking-1Not available | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MAI-Thinking-1Not available | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MAI-Thinking-1Not available | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MAI-Thinking-1256K | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)128K | MAI-Thinking-1 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MAI-Thinking-1 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 46% | — | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MAI-Thinking-1 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphwalks BFS 128KSource | 90% | — | Not comparable |
Knowledge4 benchmarks
MathMAI-Thinking-1 wins5 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MAI-Thinking-1 | Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchSource | 85% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?
MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for math, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?
MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 89.7 versus 6.4. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.