Skip to main content

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MAI-Thinking-1

65

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

66

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #23 · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #27

Pick Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
46vs51.5

+5.5 difference

Coding

MAI-Thinking-1
71vs66.9

+4.1 difference

Knowledge

MAI-Thinking-1
69.9vs60.5

+9.4 difference

Operational Comparison

MAI-Thinking-1

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 65. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 51.5 against 46. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 87.7% to 80.4%. MAI-Thinking-1 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 87.7% and 80.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 60.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71 versus 66.9. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.5 versus 46. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.