Skip to main content

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MAI-Thinking-1

65

VS

Qwen3.7 Plus

87

1 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #23 · Qwen3.7 Plus #3

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.7 Plus
46vs71.7

+25.7 difference

Coding

Qwen3.7 Plus
71vs71.1

+0.1 difference

Knowledge

MAI-Thinking-1
69.9vs67.9

+2.0 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.7 Plus
85vs89.2

+4.2 difference

Operational Comparison

MAI-Thinking-1

Qwen3.7 Plus

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Qwen3.7 Plus is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Plus's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 71.7 against 46. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 46% to 70.3%. MAI-Thinking-1 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.7 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 46% and 70.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 67.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71.1 versus 71. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.7 versus 46. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89.2 versus 85. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.