Skip to main content

Model comparison

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
Alibaba
48.16/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 unranked (Not scored); Qwen3 Max #128 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3 Max share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to MAI-Thinking-1; 14 to Qwen3 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
MAI-Thinking-1 only
13
Qwen3 Max only
14
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3 Max has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMAI-Thinking-1Not availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMAI-Thinking-1Not availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMAI-Thinking-1Not availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMAI-Thinking-1256KQwen3 Max1MQwen3 Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 43.74%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 3.51%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 46.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 84.2%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 24.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -43.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1148Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Qwen3 MaxResult
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 44.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3 Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.