Skip to main content

Model comparison

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Fugu Cyber

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
Sakana AI
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. MAI-Thinking-1 and Fugu Cyber share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to MAI-Thinking-1; 2 to Fugu Cyber.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
MAI-Thinking-1 only
13
Fugu Cyber only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MAI-Thinking-1 and Fugu Cyber is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Fugu Cyber has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMAI-Thinking-1Not availableFugu Cyber$6 input / $36 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMAI-Thinking-1Not availableFugu CyberNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMAI-Thinking-1Not availableFugu CyberNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMAI-Thinking-1256KFugu Cyber1MFugu Cyber lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 86.9%Not comparable
CTI-REALMSource 72.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberResult
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberResult
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 84.2%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberResult
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Fugu CyberResult
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare MAI-Thinking-1 and Fugu Cyber on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for MAI-Thinking-1 and Fugu Cyber today?

Fugu Cyber: $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.