Skip to main content

Model comparison

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

58/100
Margin
13.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #27; Soofi S 30B-A3B unranked

Evidence parity. MAI-Thinking-1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 3 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to MAI-Thinking-1; 5 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
3
MAI-Thinking-1 only
11
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

MAI-Thinking-1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 58 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MAI-Thinking-1's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 72.5 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.2% to 43.4%.

MAI-Thinking-1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for MAI-Thinking-1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryMAI-Thinking-1ΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeMAI-Thinking-172.5Margin 22.6Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
AgenticMAI-Thinking-146.0MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
CodingMAI-Thinking-160.5MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MathMAI-Thinking-189.7MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
Inst. FollowingMAI-Thinking-185.0MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · MAI-Thinking-1B · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 84.2%B 43.4%
    Winner: MAI-Thinking-1Δ 40.8
    GPQA: MAI-Thinking-1 scored 84.2%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. MAI-Thinking-1 wins this benchmark.
  2. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 85%B 51.4%
    Winner: MAI-Thinking-1Δ 33.6
    MMLU-Pro: MAI-Thinking-1 scored 85%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 51.4%. MAI-Thinking-1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMAI-Thinking-1Not availableSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMAI-Thinking-1Not availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMAI-Thinking-1Not availableSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMAI-Thinking-1256KSoofi S 30B-A3B1MSoofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
LiveCodeBench v6Source 87.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeMAI-Thinking-1 wins
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
GPQASource 84.2%43.4%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
GPQA-DSource 84.2%43.4%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
MMLU-ProSource 85%51.4%MAI-Thinking-1 leads
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMAI-Thinking-1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

MAI-Thinking-1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 58 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.2% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.5 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.