Skip to main content

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking vs o3-mini

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

VS

o3-mini

55

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
69.9vs49.3

+20.6 difference

Knowledge

o3-mini
57.6vs77.2

+19.6 difference

Inst. Following

o3-mini
76.5vs93.9

+17.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

o3-mini

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$1.1 / $4.4

Speed

N/A

160 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

7.12s

Context Window

128K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 59 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 69.9 against 49.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 57.6% to 77.2%. o3-mini does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

o3-mini gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or o3-mini?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 57.6% and 77.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or o3-mini?

o3-mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 57.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or o3-mini?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 49.3. o3-mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking or o3-mini?

o3-mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.9 versus 76.5. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.