Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5-Pro #14 (Supported); MiMo-V2-Pro #17 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5-Pro; 2 to MiMo-V2-Pro.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 18
- MiMo-V2-Pro only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Pro only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 70.19 versus 67.78. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Δ | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2 | Margin→ 20.8 | MiMo-V2-Pro78.0 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured |
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.5-Pro1M | MiMo-V2-Pro1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 63.8% | 57.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1265 | — | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 72.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 68.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 29.1% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | 95% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 38.3% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 2.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 62.70% | 36.68% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 873 | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 38.2% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 43.2% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 65.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 73.3% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 15.3% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Pro wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 48% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 34% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.2% | 40.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.6% | 87.0% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 33.8% | 28.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 3.6% | 4.9% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 22.6% | 26.8% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 24.5% | 29.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 38.9% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1298 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 79.9% | 68.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 70.19 to 67.78.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 57.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.