Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
82
o3-mini
58
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Coding
+7.9 difference
Knowledge
+29.2 difference
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
o3-mini
$1 / $3
$1.1 / $4.4
N/A
160 t/s
N/A
7.12s
1M
200K
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 82 to 58. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 57.2 against 49.3. o3-mini does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
o3-mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.00 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o3-mini.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 82 to 58.
o3-mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 48. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 57.2 versus 49.3. o3-mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.