MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads for most workloads by a narrow margin.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
75
SWE-1.7
75
Treat this as a split decision. MiMo-V2.5-Pro makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; SWE-1.7 is the better fit if agentic is the priority.
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Δ | SWE-1.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 68.4 | → 13.1 | 81.5 |
| Coding | 57.2 | — | — |
| Knowledge | 48.0 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
SWE-1.7
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
256K
Quick Verdict
Treat this as a split decision. MiMo-V2.5-Pro makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; SWE-1.7 is the better fit if agentic is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and SWE-1.7 finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for SWE-1.7.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or SWE-1.7?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and SWE-1.7 are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 68.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.