Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); MiMo-V2-Omni #40 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 13 to MiMo-V2-Omni.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 10
- MiMo-V2-Omni only
- 13
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Omni if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Omni is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 63.15 to 58.62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Omni's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 74.8 against 56.1.
MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2.5 | Δ | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2.556.1 | Margin→ 18.7 | MiMo-V2-Omni74.8 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2.565.8 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Multimodal | MiMo-V2.579.0 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.51M | MiMo-V2-Omni262K | MiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic6 benchmarks
CodingMiMo-V2-Omni wins4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 35.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 82.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 19.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -17.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 18.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 53.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 63.15 to 58.62.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 56.1. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.