Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); MiMo-V2-Pro #17 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share 3 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 12 to MiMo-V2-Pro.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 8
- MiMo-V2-Pro only
- 12
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Pro is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 67.78 to 58.62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 78 against 56.1.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2.5 | Δ | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2.556.1 | Margin→ 21.9 | MiMo-V2-Pro78.0 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2.565.8 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured |
| Multimodal | MiMo-V2.579.0 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.51M | MiMo-V2-Pro1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic6 benchmarks
CodingMiMo-V2-Pro wins4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 40.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 28.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 4.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 26.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 29.9% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 68.8% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.78 to 58.62.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 56.1. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.