Skip to main content

MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MiMo-V2.5

72

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

64

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #11

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5
65.8vs56.1

+9.7 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
56.1vs72

+15.9 difference

Multimodal

MiMo-V2.5
78.9vs77.2

+1.7 difference

Operational Comparison

MiMo-V2.5

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.8 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 65.8% to 49.4%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 65.8% and 49.4%.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 56.1. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.9 versus 77.2. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.