Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5
71
Qwen3.7 Max
93
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 unranked · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+3.9 difference
Coding
+17.5 difference
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3.7 Max
$null / $null
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 71. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.6 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 56.1% to 60.6%.
Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 56.1% and 60.6%.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 56.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 65.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.