Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs o1-pro
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Flash #96 (Supported); o1-pro #148 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Flash and o1-pro share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 17 results are unique to MiMo-V2-Flash; 0 to o1-pro.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 17
- o1-pro only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Flash is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 53.21 to 45.03. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Flash's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 84.7 against 79. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 83.7% to 79%.
o1-pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. MiMo-V2-Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for o1-pro.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Flash | Δ | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2-Flash84.7 | Margin← 5.7 | o1-pro79.0 |
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Flash73.4 | MarginNo overlap | o1-proNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 83.7%B 79%Winner: MiMo-V2-FlashΔ 4.7GPQA: MiMo-V2-Flash scored 83.7%; o1-pro scored 79%. MiMo-V2-Flash wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 output | o1-pro$150 input / $600 output | MiMo-V2-Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/s | o1-proNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-Flash2.14 s | o1-proNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Flash256K | o1-pro200K | MiMo-V2-Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeMiMo-V2-Flash wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 83.7% | 79% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 24.7% | 18.9% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 65.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 8.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -48.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 15.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 75.1% | — | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 94.1% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 39.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Flash is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 53.21 to 45.03. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 83.7% and 79%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.7 versus 79. Inside this category, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.