Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Omni unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24
BenchAlign evidence: MiMo-V2-Omni supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Omni and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to MiMo-V2-Omni; 26 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- MiMo-V2-Omni only
- 2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 26
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Omni if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Omni is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 66 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Omni's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 74.8 against 58.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 74.8% to 71.9%.
Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Omni | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Omni74.8 | Margin← 16.5 | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Reasoning | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Multilingual | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Inst. Following | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 74.8%B 71.9%Winner: MiMo-V2-OmniΔ 2.9SWE-bench Verified: MiMo-V2-Omni scored 74.8%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 71.9%. MiMo-V2-Omni wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Omni | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Omni262K | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 45.2% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 91.2% | 83.3% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Omni wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 74.8% | 71.9% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 34.8% | 36.4% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 36.7% | 39.9% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 35.0% | 37.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 82.8% | 86.7% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 19.9% | 26.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -17.4% | -0.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 18.7% | 21.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 44.4% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Omni or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Omni is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 74.8% and 71.9%.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Omni or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 58.3. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.