Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Step 3.7 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
BenchAlign evidence: MiMo-V2-Omni supported; Step 3.7 Flash estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Omni and Step 3.7 Flash share 14 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to MiMo-V2-Omni; 16 to Step 3.7 Flash.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 14
- MiMo-V2-Omni only
- 1
- Step 3.7 Flash only
- 16
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Omni if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Step 3.7 Flash only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Omni is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 66 to 57. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Omni's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 74.8 against 56.3.
MiMo-V2-Omni gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Step 3.7 Flash.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Omni | Δ | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Omni74.8 | Margin← 18.5 | Step 3.7 Flash56.3 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Step 3.7 Flash66.4 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Omni | Step 3.7 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | Step 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Omni262K | Step 3.7 Flash256K | MiMo-V2-Omni lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 45.2% | 67.1% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 91.2% | 98.5% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 59.5% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 92.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 25.9% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 49.5% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 51.57% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 21.5% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1017 | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 14.8% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Omni wins6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 74.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 34.8% | 35.6% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 36.7% | 40.0% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 56.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 59.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 39.6% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 35.0% | 30.3% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 82.8% | 80.9% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
| AA-HLESource | 19.9% | 19.9% | Tie |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -17.4% | -37.5% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 18.7% | 25.4% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 44.4% | 84.4% | MiMo-V2-Omni leads |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 53.5% | 67.3% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Omni or Step 3.7 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Omni is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 57.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Omni or Step 3.7 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 56.3. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.