Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiniMax M3
Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Pro unranked; MiniMax M3 #18
BenchAlign evidence: MiMo-V2-Pro supported; MiniMax M3 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Pro and MiniMax M3 share 15 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to MiMo-V2-Pro; 30 to MiniMax M3.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 15
- MiMo-V2-Pro only
- 1
- MiniMax M3 only
- 30
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M3 only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Pro has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 72 versus 70. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
MiMo-V2-Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 78 against 72.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 78% to 80.5%.
MiMo-V2-Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Pro | Δ | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Pro78.0 | Margin← 5.8 | MiniMax M372.2 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M372.3 |
| Math | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M385.7 |
| Multimodal | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M364.9 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 78%B 80.5%Winner: MiniMax M3Δ 2.5SWE-bench Verified: MiMo-V2-Pro scored 78%; MiniMax M3 scored 80.5%. MiniMax M3 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | MiniMax M3$0.3 input / $1.2 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | MiniMax M3Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | MiniMax M3Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Pro1M | MiniMax M31M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 57.8% | 74.5% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95% | 88.9% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 36.68% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 15.3% | 19.8% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 66% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 83.5% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 70.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 35.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 44.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1395 | Not comparable |
| GDPval rubricsSource | — | 74.7% | Not comparable |
| BankerToolBenchSource | — | 76.1% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 4.6% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 1110 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 32.1% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 6.7% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Pro wins11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 78% | 80.5% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 40.9% | 42.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 42.5% | 45.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 59% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 66.0% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 42.1% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 58.6% | Not comparable |
| VIBE V2Source | — | 50.1% | Not comparable |
| SVG-BenchSource | — | 63.7% | Not comparable |
| KernelBench HardSource | — | 28.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | — | 65.2% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 40.3% | 44.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.0% | 92.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 28.3% | 37.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 4.9% | 1.4% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 26.8% | 15.0% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 29.9% | 16.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 33.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAMO 2026Source | — | 85.7% | Not comparable |
Multimodal7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OfficeQA ProSource | — | 45.1% | Not comparable |
| OmniDocBench 1.5Source | — | 91.6% | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.1% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 84.6% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Source | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1294 | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.6% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 68.8% | 82.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax M3?
MiMo-V2-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 70. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 78% and 80.5%.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax M3?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 72.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.