Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Pro unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24
BenchAlign evidence: MiMo-V2-Pro supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to MiMo-V2-Pro; 26 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- MiMo-V2-Pro only
- 3
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 26
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 78 against 58.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 78% to 71.9%.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Pro | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Pro78.0 | Margin← 19.7 | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Reasoning | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Multilingual | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Inst. Following | MiMo-V2-ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 78%B 71.9%Winner: MiMo-V2-ProΔ 6.1SWE-bench Verified: MiMo-V2-Pro scored 78%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 71.9%. MiMo-V2-Pro wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-ProNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Pro1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 57.8% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95% | 83.3% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 36.68% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 15.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 33.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1164 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Pro wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 78% | 71.9% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 40.9% | 36.4% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 42.5% | 39.9% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 49.3% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 40.3% | 37.8% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.0% | 86.7% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 28.3% | 26.6% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 4.9% | -0.8% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 26.8% | 21.6% | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 29.9% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1132 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Pro or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 78% and 71.9%.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Pro or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 78 versus 58.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.