Skip to main content

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.78/100
Margin
19.6pts
← winning
Alibaba
48.16/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Pro #17 (Supported); Qwen3 Max #128 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to MiMo-V2-Pro; 2 to Qwen3 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
MiMo-V2-Pro only
3
Qwen3 Max only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max
CategoryMiMo-V2-ProΔQwen3 Max
CodingMiMo-V2-Pro78.0MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiMo-V2-ProNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiMo-V2-ProNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiMo-V2-ProNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiMo-V2-Pro1MQwen3 Max1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxResult
Claw-EvalSource 57.8%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95%74.3%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 36.68%43.74%Qwen3 Max leads
ResearchClawBenchSource 15.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 78%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.5%38.3%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 3.51%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 60.7%46.7%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
CritPtSource 0.3%0.0%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.3%24.0%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.0%76.4%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA-HLESource 28.3%11.1%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 4.9%-43.1%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 26.8%24.4%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 29.9%89.4%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1148Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProQwen3 MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 68.8%44.1%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3 Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.