Skip to main content

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MiniMax M3

76

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

64

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: MiniMax M3 #12 · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #11

Pick MiniMax M3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiniMax M3
71.9vs56.1

+15.8 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
67vs72

+5.0 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
64.9vs77.2

+12.3 difference

Operational Comparison

MiniMax M3

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.3 / $1.2

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick MiniMax M3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

MiniMax M3 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 76 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiniMax M3's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 71.9 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 83.5% to 63.8%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiniMax M3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiniMax M3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

MiniMax M3 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 76 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 83.5% and 63.8%.

Which is better for coding, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 67. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

MiniMax M3 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.9 versus 56.1. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 64.9. MiniMax M3 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.