Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mistral Large 3 vs Phi-4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

50.4/100
Margin
27.7pts
← winning
Microsoft
22.69/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported); Phi-4 #192 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mistral Large 3 and Phi-4 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Mistral Large 3; 0 to Phi-4.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
11
Mistral Large 3 only
5
Phi-4 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mistral Large 3 and Phi-4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Mistral Large 3 is priced at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Phi-4. Mistral Large 3 has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 16K for Phi-4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMistral Large 3Phi-4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputPhi-4$0 input / $0 outputPhi-4 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondMistral Large 348 tok/sPhi-435 tok/sMistral Large 3 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMistral Large 31.04 sPhi-42.02 sMistral Large 3 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMistral Large 3128KPhi-416KMistral Large 3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Phi-4Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 5.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 24.6%0%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource 6.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 633Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Phi-4Result
AA Coding IndexSource 20.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%26.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Phi-4Result
AA-LCRSource 34.7%0.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Phi-4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 15.9%4.9%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.0%57.5%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-HLESource 4.1%4.1%Tie
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -39.4%-56.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.1%13.2%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.7%80.5%Phi-4 leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Phi-4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 55.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Phi-4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.2%23.5%Mistral Large 3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mistral Large 3 and Phi-4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mistral Large 3 and Phi-4 today?

Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Phi-4: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Phi-4
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.