Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mistral Large 3 vs Trinity-Large-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

50.4/100
Margin
5.5pts
winning →
55.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mistral Large 3 #113 (Supported); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mistral Large 3 and Trinity-Large-Preview share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Mistral Large 3; 5 to Trinity-Large-Preview.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
13
Mistral Large 3 only
3
Trinity-Large-Preview only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mistral Large 3 and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Mistral Large 3 is priced at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens for Trinity-Large-Preview. Trinity-Large-Preview has the larger context window at 512K, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMistral Large 3$0.5 input / $1.5 outputTrinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 outputTrinity-Large-Preview has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondMistral Large 348 tok/sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMistral Large 31.04 sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMistral Large 3128KTrinity-Large-Preview512KTrinity-Large-Preview lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 5.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 24.6%90.1%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 6.6%2.7%Mistral Large 3 leads
GDPval-AASource 633554Mistral Large 3 leads
Coding
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA Coding IndexSource 20.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%36.1%Mistral Large 3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 34.7%33.0%Mistral Large 3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.9%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 15.9%24.5%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.0%75.2%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-HLESource 4.1%14.7%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -39.4%-44.2%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.1%22.8%Mistral Large 3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.7%86.6%Mistral Large 3 leads
MMLUSource 87.2%Not comparable
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 75.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 63.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 24.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 55.7%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1165Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.2%56.3%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mistral Large 3 and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mistral Large 3 and Trinity-Large-Preview today?

Mistral Large 3: $0.50 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Mistral Large 3
API / mo$1,500
Self-host / mo$9,110
Break-even380M/day
Trinity-Large-Preview
API / mo$938
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.