Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
79
Qwen3.7 Max
93
Verified leaderboard positions: Mistral Medium 3.5 128B unranked · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+4.0 difference
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
Qwen3.7 Max
$1.5 / $7.5
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 79. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Max gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B.
Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 79. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 77.6% and 80.4%.
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.6 versus 73.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.