Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and SWE-1.7 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 25 results are unique to Mistral Medium 3.5 128B; 4 to SWE-1.7.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B only
- 25
- SWE-1.7 only
- 4
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and SWE-1.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | SWE-1.7 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B$1.5 input / $7.5 output | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BNot available | SWE-1.7Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B256K | SWE-1.7256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 91.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 19.0% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 21.4% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 929 | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 39.10% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 506 | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 33.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 0.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 14.4% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 81.5% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 77.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 46.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 39.6% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource | — | 42.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 81.5% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 77.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 29.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 74.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 12.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -36.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 25.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 82.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 64.9% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | SWE-1.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 68.8% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and SWE-1.7 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and SWE-1.7 today?
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.