Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3 vs Ornith-1.0-397B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Mistral Medium 3 #156 (Estimated); Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Mistral Medium 3 and Ornith-1.0-397B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Mistral Medium 3; 7 to Ornith-1.0-397B.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Mistral Medium 3 only
- 13
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Mistral Medium 3 and Ornith-1.0-397B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Mistral Medium 3 is priced at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-397B. Ornith-1.0-397B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Mistral Medium 3.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3 | Ornith-1.0-397B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Mistral Medium 3$0.4 input / $2 output | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | Ornith-1.0-397B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Mistral Medium 357 tok/s | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Mistral Medium 31.20 s | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Mistral Medium 3128K | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Ornith-1.0-397B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic3 benchmarks
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3 | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 12.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 57.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 4.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -31.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 18.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 60.9% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3 | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 39.3% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Mistral Medium 3 and Ornith-1.0-397B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Mistral Medium 3 and Ornith-1.0-397B today?
Mistral Medium 3: $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.