Model comparison
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 vs o3
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 and o3 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1; 17 to o3.
Updated July 14, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 only
- 0
- o3 only
- 17
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 and o3 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
o3 is priced at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1. o3 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 | o3 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1$0 input / $0 output | o3$2 input / $8 output | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Not available | o3118 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Not available | o35.38 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.164K | o3200K | o3 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 | o3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tau2-TelecomSource | — | 80.7% | Not comparable |
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 | o3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 30.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 82.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 20.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -15.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 38.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 87.1% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 | o3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 71.4% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 and o3 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 and o3 today?
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens o3: $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.