Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1
78
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
60
Verified leaderboard positions: Muse Spark 1.1 unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #28
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Δ | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 80.4 | ← 24.0 | 56.4 |
| Knowledge | 62.1 | → 21.5 | 83.6 |
| Multimodal | 88.4 | ← 11.2 | 77.2 |
| Coding | 61.5 | → 10.5 | 72.0 |
| Reasoning | — | — | 60.2 |
| Multilingual | — | — | 82.2 |
| Inst. Following | — | — | 93.4 |
Operational Comparison
Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Quick Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Muse Spark 1.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 78 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Muse Spark 1.1's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 80.4 against 56.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 80% to 49.4%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 80% and 49.4%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.6 versus 62.1. Muse Spark 1.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 61.5. Muse Spark 1.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.4 versus 56.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.4 versus 77.2. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.