Muse Spark 1.1 vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1
78
SWE-1.7
75
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. SWE-1.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Δ | SWE-1.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 80.4 | → 1.1 | 81.5 |
| Coding | 61.5 | — | — |
| Knowledge | 62.1 | — | — |
| Multimodal | 88.4 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-1.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
256K
Quick Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. SWE-1.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Muse Spark 1.1 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 78 versus 75. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for SWE-1.7.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or SWE-1.7?
Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 75. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 80% and 81.5%.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 80.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.