Skip to main content
Radar

Provider changes are easy to miss. Radar watches releases, pricing, deprecations, and incidents at the source.Provider changes are easy to miss.

See Radar
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Updated August 11, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

NVIDIA

26.9/100

Estimated · Public rank #204

90% interval 17.1–36.8

Qwen3.7 Plus

Alibaba

65.8/100

Supported · Public rank #31

90% interval 56.0–75.6

Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score, 65.8 versus 26.93, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.

9 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.

Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.

Show secondary and unsupported calls

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    The category averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so they are directional rather than like-for-like.

    Confidence: limited

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    The category averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so they are directional rather than like-for-like.

    Confidence: limited

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    No clear pick

    The documented context windows are equal.

    Confidence: documented

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shared results
9
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 only
4
Qwen3.7 Plus only
42
Like-for-like categories
0 / 8

4 categories use different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.

Agentic

Directional only
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
29.1
Qwen3.7 Plus
71.7
Weighted basis
2 vs 2 rows
Reading
Directional only

Coding

Directional only
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
42.1
Qwen3.7 Plus
75.6
Weighted basis
2 vs 4 rows
Reading
Directional only

Knowledge

Directional only
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
80.5
Qwen3.7 Plus
60.1
Weighted basis
2 vs 4 rows
Reading
Directional only

Instruction following

Directional only
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
72.9
Qwen3.7 Plus
84.5
Weighted basis
1 vs 2 rows
Reading
Directional only

Reasoning

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Not measured
Qwen3.7 Plus
91.7
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Not measured
Qwen3.7 Plus
92.9
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Not measured
Qwen3.7 Plus
85.4
Weighted basis
0 vs 1 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Not measured
Qwen3.7 Plus
81.5
Weighted basis
0 vs 2 rows
Reading
Not comparable

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus
API rate not published
Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus
API rate not published
Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Qwen3.7 Plus
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

API model ID

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

No comparable hosted API rate

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning model card

Qwen3.7 Plus

No comparable hosted API rate

Documented inputs

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Provider availability

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Reasoning

Qwen3.7 Plus

Reasoning

Weight access

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Open Weight

Qwen3.7 Plus

Proprietary

License

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Open Weight

Qwen3.7 Plus

Proprietary

Release date

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

2026-08-11

Qwen3.7 Plus

2026-06-03

If you already use one of these models
Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score, 65.8 versus 26.93, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Both models list 1M.

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence55 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP423.5%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • PinchBench

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP483.4%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus—

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP436.8%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus—

    Not directly comparable

  • τ³-bench results

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP49.5%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus—

    Not directly comparable

  • QwenClawBench

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus61.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Claw-Eval

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus62.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BFCL v4

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus72.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP Atlas

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus73.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • VITA-Bench

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus45.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepPlanning

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus62.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld-Verified

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus73.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • AndroidWorld

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus81.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld 2.0

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus2.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP452.8%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus77.7%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • SWE Multilingual

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP436.5%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus75.8%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP423.5%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • SciCode

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP431.4%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus51.3%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • SWE-bench Pro

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus57.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • NL2Repo

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus41.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • LiveCodeBench

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus89.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Reasoning

  • CritPt

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus9.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MRCRv2

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus91.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • GPQA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP475.6%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • GPQA-D

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP475.6%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • HLE w/o tools

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP410.5%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP481.6%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus88.5%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • HLE

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus34.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Redux

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus94.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SuperGPQA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus71.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MMMLU

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus89.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • HMMT Feb 2026

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus92.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • IMOAnswerBench

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus86.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Apex

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus22.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multilingual

  • MMLU-ProX

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • NOVA-63

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus58.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • INCLUDE

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus83.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MAXIFE

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus88.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • PolyMath

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus84.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • MMMU-Pro

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus79%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MathVision

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CharXiv

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus85.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ERQA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus69.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MedXpertQA (MM)

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus71.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ScreenSpot Pro

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus79.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SimpleVQA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus81.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MMSearch-Plus

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus41.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • RealWorldQA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus86.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OmniDocBench 1.5

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus91.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OCRBench V2

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus70.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ODINW13

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus51.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Video-MME (with subtitle)

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus88.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • VideoMMMU

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MLVU (M-Avg)

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus87.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFBench

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP472.9%
    Source
    Qwen3.7 Plus79.1%
    Source

    Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result

  • IFEval

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4—
    Qwen3.7 Plus94.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score, 65.8 versus 26.93, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap. That is the clearest overall quality signal in the current public data.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

The current coding averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so BenchLM does not name a winner from them. Read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

The current agentic tasks averages use different weighted benchmark sets, so BenchLM does not name a winner from them. Read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.

Which costs less, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Both models list the same context window, 1M.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated August 11, 2026

Watch Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.