Skip to main content
BenchLM

Data as of September 24, 2026 · How the score is built

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

Decision readingNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 scores 19.1 out of 100 and ranks #186 of 194. This profile shows 13 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #67. Published weights can be self-hosted, but infrastructure cost varies and is not a comparable API token rate.

Released Aug 11, 2026 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

19.1/100

field median 50.2#186 of 194 ranked models

Public

#186of 194

Verified —

Price

Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies

input median $0.97No comparable first-party hosted token rate

Speed

Not measured

field median 91 tok/sTime to first token not measured

Context

1Mtokens

field median 256,000Maximum output length is tracked separately

Strongest published evidence

Instruction Following ranks #67. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Validate before choosing

13 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.

Source-linked · 13 displayable benchmark rows

Follow model changes

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank #104 of 105Percentile 1stWeight 22%4 benchmarksVerified
7.3
CodingRank #135 of 135Percentile 0thWeight 20%4 benchmarksVerified
11.4
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeRank #154 of 158Percentile 3rdWeight 12%4 benchmarksVerified
20.7
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingRank #67 of 124Percentile 46thWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified
68.5
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured

13 of 483 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic4/4 verified
  2. Coding4/4 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. Knowledge4/4 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. Following1/1 verified
  8. MathNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Capability shape

Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 category percentile values

  • Agentic1st percentile
  • Coding0th percentile
  • ReasoningNot eligible
  • MultimodalNot eligible
  • Knowledge3rd percentile
  • MultilingualNot eligible
  • Instruction following46th percentile
  • MathNot eligible

The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.

Eligible category ranks

  1. Agentic#104/105
  2. Coding#135/135
  3. ReasoningNot ranked
  4. MultimodalNot ranked
  5. Knowledge#154/158
  6. MultilingualNot ranked
  7. Inst. Following#67/124
  8. MathNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding4 rows
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SciCodeScientific Code BenchmarkScore31.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu · 60.1%

Gap28.7 behindWeight10% ref. weight
SWE MultilingualScore36.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 93.9%

Gap57.4 behindWeight5% ref. weight
Terminal-Bench 2.1Score23.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: SWE-2 · 92.8%

Gap69.3 behindWeightScored in Agentic
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark VerifiedScore52.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96%

Gap43.2 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic4 rows
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Terminal-Bench 2.1Score23.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: SWE-2 · 92.8%

Gap69.3 behindWeight8% ref. weight
BrowseCompScore36.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Atria Dawn Preview · 92.5%

Gap55.7 behindWeight8% ref. weight
τ³-bench resultsτ³-Bench Tool-Agent-User EvaluationScore9.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Mercury 2.5 · 96.0%

Gap86.5 behindWeight2% ref. weight
PinchBenchScore83.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Pokee-Isaac 28B · 95.7%

Gap12.2 behindWeightDisplay only
Knowledge4 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
HLE w/o toolsHumanity's Last Exam without toolsScore10.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 64.4%

Gap53.9 behindWeight7% ref. weight
MMLU-ProMassive Multitask Language Understanding ProfessionalScore81.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 89.6%

Gap8 behindWeight6% ref. weight
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore75.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96%

Gap20.4 behindWeight3% ref. weight
GPQA-DGPQA DiamondScore75.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0%

Gap20.4 behindWeightDisplay only
Inst. Following1 row
Inst. Following benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
IFBenchInstruction Following BenchmarkScore72.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85%

Gap12.1 behindWeightWeighted 70%

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 13 rows

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Aug 11, 2026 · you are here

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4

    Score 19.1 · Price not listed

30b-a3b-nvfp4 · NVFP4

Radar

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 release history

Full release history

Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.

Radar

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not sourced yet
Availability
Open NVFP4 checkpoint for self-hosted inference; NVIDIA documents deployments on DGX Spark, H100, and other supported NVIDIA hardware.
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Current
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing recordNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning model card
Self-host
Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 ranks #186 of 194 on the public leaderboard with a score of 19.1/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 is a open weight model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

Open NVFP4 checkpoint for self-hosted inference; NVIDIA documents deployments on DGX Spark, H100, and other supported NVIDIA hardware.

13 of 483 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #67, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #154. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Last updated September 24, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.

Estimate VRAM from known parameters

Questions

How does Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 ranks #186 out of 194 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 19.1/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 13 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 good for knowledge and understanding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 ranks #154 out of 158 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 20.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 good for coding and programming?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 ranks #135 out of 135 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 11.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 ranks #104 out of 105 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 7.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 good for instruction following?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 ranks #67 out of 124 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 68.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 open source?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 is an open-weight model from NVIDIA. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.

Does Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 currently has 27 source-displayable rows across 483 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.

Watch Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

Compare Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4 with every tracked model506 comparisons