Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
56
o1-pro
29
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Knowledge
+3.5 difference
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
o1-pro
$0 / $0
$150 / $600
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
200K
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 56 to 29. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o1-pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for o1-pro.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 56 to 29. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 72.2% and 79%.
o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 75.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.