Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.0-397B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #151 (Estimated); Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Ornith-1.0-397B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 26 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 7 to Ornith-1.0-397B.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 26
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Ornith-1.0-397B is the better fit if coding is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Ornith-1.0-397B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Ornith-1.0-397B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
CodingOrnith-1.0-397B wins7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SciCodeSource | 32% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 27.8% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 82.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 62.2% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 78.9% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 48.2% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 77.5% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 77.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 46.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 5.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -56.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 14.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 83.1% | — | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 82.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMUSource | 70.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | 57.5% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 76.3% | — | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 57.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | 88.5% | — | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 53.2% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Ornith-1.0-397B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Ornith-1.0-397B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 32. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.