Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 19 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

43.32/100
Margin
16.3pts
winning →
59.6/100
0 category wins4 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated); Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #52 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B share 19 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 12 to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
19
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
10
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
12
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 19 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 59.6 to 43.32. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 32. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 72.2% to 86.6%.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔQwen3.5-122B-A10B
CodingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0Margin→ 40.0Qwen3.5-122B-A10B72.0
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2Margin→ 19.2Qwen3.5-122B-A10B93.4
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin→ 7.3Qwen3.5-122B-A10B83.6
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin→ 0.9Qwen3.5-122B-A10B77.2
AgenticNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B56.4
ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B60.2
MultilingualNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B82.2

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BB · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 72.2%B 86.6%
    Winner: Qwen3.5-122B-A10BΔ 14.4
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 86.6%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins this benchmark.

  2. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 77.3%B 86.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.5-122B-A10BΔ 9.4
    MMLU-Pro: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 77.3%; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 86.7%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins this benchmark.

  3. CharXiv

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 76.3%B 77.2%
    Winner: Qwen3.5-122B-A10BΔ 1
    CharXiv: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 76.3%; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scored 77.2%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5-122B-A10B$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.5-122B-A10BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.5-122B-A10BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KQwen3.5-122B-A10B262KQwen3.5-122B-A10B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
OSWorldSource 47.4%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 45.3%93.6%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%24.1%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
GDPval-AASource 465982Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —49.4%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource —63.8%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —20.7%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
SciCodeSource 32%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 27.8%42.0%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
AA Coding IndexSource 13.8%45.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —72%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
AA-LCRSource 35.7%66.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.6%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
LongBench v2Source —60.2%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
MMLU-ProSource 77.3%86.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
GPQASource 72.2%86.6%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
GPQA-DSource 72.2%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%32.3%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 46.9%85.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
AA-HLESource 5.3%23.4%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.0%-39.6%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.8%24.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.1%85.5%Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads
SuperGPQASource —67.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
AIME 2025Source 82.1%—Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
MMLU-ProXSource —82.2%Not comparable
MultimodalQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
MMMUSource 70.8%83.9%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
MMLongBench-DocSource 57.5%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 76.3%77.2%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.8%—Not comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source 72.2%—Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource 88.5%—Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 90.5%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.2%75.0%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
MMVUSource —74.7%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —86.2%Not comparable
V*Source —93.2%Not comparable
Inst. FollowingQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
IFBenchSource 74.2%—Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 63.2%75.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
IFEvalSource —93.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 59.6 to 43.32. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 72.2% and 86.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.6 versus 76.3. Inside this category, AA-GPQA Diamond is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 32. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.2 versus 76.3. Inside this category, AA-MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 74.2. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

NVIDIA Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.