Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs o1-pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60/100
Margin
14.2pts
← winning
OpenAI
45.8/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Ultra #24; o1-pro unranked

BenchAlign evidence: Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored; o1-pro estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Ultra and o1-pro share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 37 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Ultra; 0 to o1-pro.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
2
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
37
o1-pro only
0
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Nemotron 3 Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 30. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o1-pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1-pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Ultra and o1-pro
CategoryNemotron 3 UltraΔo1-pro
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra54.2Margin 24.8o1-pro79.0
AgenticNemotron 3 Ultra51.3MarginNo overlapo1-proNot measured
CodingNemotron 3 Ultra58.3MarginNo overlapo1-proNot measured
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra61.9MarginNo overlapo1-proNot measured
MultilingualNemotron 3 Ultra83.0MarginNo overlapo1-proNot measured
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Ultra81.7MarginNo overlapo1-proNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 UltraB · o1-pro
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87%B 79%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 8
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%; o1-pro scored 79%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputo1-pro$150 input / $600 outputNemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 UltraNot availableo1-proNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 UltraNot availableo1-proNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Ultra1Mo1-pro200KNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 36.4%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
AA-LCRSource 67.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 3.1%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
Knowledgeo1-pro wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
GPQASource 87%79%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.8%18.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -0.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 28.5%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1-proResult
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 81.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or o1-pro?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 30. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87% and 79%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or o1-pro?

o1-pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79 versus 54.2. Inside this category, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.